Second degree murder;
Perfect self defense;
Disqualifying instruction;
Possession of a firearm by a felon;
Preserved Objection;
Closing Argument;

First-degree sexual offense with a child;
Indecent liberties with a child;
Solicitation of murder;
Rule 401;
Rule 403;
Prejudice;
Curative instruction;

Waiver of counsel; N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242; jury instructions; less-included offenses.

plain error, child sexual abuse, witness testimony, credibility of child's testimony

deviation from pattern jury instruction, prejudicial error, conviction of crime the jury was not instructed on

jury instruction; common law robbery; claim of right defense; felonious intent; no error.

Defendant's burden to establish reasonable doubt, specific intent, AWDWIKISI, Allen charge

First Degree Murder; hearsay; substantial evidence

motion to continue, judge's personal experience, abuse of discretion, preservation

Probable cause; N.C.G.S. § 14-415.1; right to bear arms.

Workers compensation; preclusion; bellwether

PWC; interlocutory appeal; N.C.G.S. § 50-16.4; sanctions

Whether the Business Court erred in granting a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, granting a motion to strike portions of an affidavit on summary judgment, and disregarding a purported expert report on summary judgment; and whether the Business Court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment, because a partnership did not exist.

Whether the Sheriffs' Education and Training Standards Commission arbitrarily or capriciously denied petitioner's application for justice officer certification upon concluding that he lacked the good moral character required of deputy sheriffs.

Whether escalating conflict and an unwillingness to communicate for the welfare of the child constitutes a substantial change in circumstances supporting a modification of a child custody order.

Whether plaintiffs' Corum claims, which allege that restrictions imposed on bars during the COVID 19 pandemic violated the Fruits of the Their Own Labor Clause and Law of the Land Clause, are colorable such that sovereign immunity does not bar their suit.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred by vacating the neglect adjudication of a juvenile whose sibling was abused.

Whether N.C.G.S. 25A-37, the anti-referral sales statute, only protects a purchaser who shows 'inducement' and whether the trial court erred in certifying a class.

Whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law when his risk of being struck by a golf ball at a driving range was open and obvious.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in vacating an order of summary judgment and whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the state statutory claims.