Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
33,981 Appellate Court Opinions
State v Wash.
State v Weichelt
State v Williams
State v. Earnhardt
State v. Goldman
State v. Jolly
State v. Vaughn
Walker v N.C. Dep't Of Corr.
Walker v N.C. Dep't Of Corr.
Ward v Carmona,
WRI/Raleigh LP v Richardson,
Zaldana v Smith,
Workers' Compensation; Refusal to Renew
Green v. Kearney
Whether plaintiffs whose claims were dismissed with prejudice before a final judgment was taken as to all parties should be liable for payment of costs of defending the action that were incurred after their claim was dismissed; N.C. R. Civ. P. 54(b)
Ramey Kemp & Assocs., Inc. v Richmond Hills Residential Partners, LLC
Trial court's grant of summary judgment for plaintiff on its claim of materialmen's lien under N.C.G.S. ? 44A-8; whether there were genuine issues of material fact.
State v. Hester
Whether the trial court committed plain error in admitting lay testimony identifying defendant as the perpetrator of a crime based primarily on original surveillance video footage not introduced at trial
State v. McDaris
Whether there was a fatal variance between the indictment under which defendant was charged and the trial court's instructions to the jury
State v. McKenzie
Whether a DWI charge should be dismissed on double jeopardy grounds because of DMV's previous one-year suspension of defendant's commercial driver?s license following his arrest for DWI
State v. Pizano-Trejo
Plain error review; whether a defendant convicted of first-degree statutory sexual offense with a child under N.C.G.S. ? 14-27.4(a)(1) should have that conviction vacated because of a variance between the language in the indictment and in the trial court's instructions to the jury
State v. Rollins
Denial of defendant's MAR following his convictions; whether the trial court abused its discretion by not holding an evidentiary hearing to consider defendant's claim that he did not receive a fair trial because of juror misconduct
State v. Wilkes
Whether defendant's motion to dismiss one of two felony assault charges against him should have been allowed because the charges stemmed from one continuous transaction